Surah Al-Masadd (The Flame), Chapter 111
By Sayyid Abul Ala Mawdudi
In
the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful;
All
the praise and Thanks is due to Allāh, the Lord of the al-`ālameen. There is
none worthy of worship except Allāh, and that Muhammad, Sallallāhu alayhi
wasallam, is His Messenger.
Period of Revelation
Although the
commentators have not disputed its being a Makki Surah, yet it is difficult to
determine in which phase of the life at Makkah precisely it was revealed.
However, in view of Abu Lahab's role and
conduct against the Prophet's message of Truth, it can be assumed
that it must have been revealed in the period when he had transgressed all
limits in his mad hostility to him, and his attitude was becoming a serious obstruction
in the progress of Islam. It may well have been revealed in the period when the
Quraish had boycotted the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) together with the
people of his clan and besieged them in Shi'b Abi Talib, and Abu Lahab was the only person to join with the enemies
against his own relatives. The basis of this assumption is that Abu Lahab was the
Prophet’s uncle, and public condemnation of the uncle by the tongue of the
nephew could not be proper until the extreme excesses committed by the uncle
had become visible to everyone. If the Surah had been revealed before this, in
the very beginning, the people would have regarded it as morally discourteous
that the nephew should so condemn the uncle.
Background
This is the only place in the Quran where a
person from among the enemies of Islam has been condemned by name, whereas in Makkah as
well as in Madinah, after the migration, there were many people who were in no
way less inimical to Islam and the Prophet Muhammad (Sallallāhu alayhi
wasallam) than Abu Lahab. The question is what was the special trait of the
character of this person, which became the basis of this condemnation by name?
To understand that it is necessary that one should understand the Arabian
society of that time and the role that Abu Lahab played in it.
In ancient days since
there prevailed chaos and confusion, bloodshed and plunder throughout Arabia,
and the condition for centuries was that a person could have no guarantee of
the protection of life, honor and property except with the help and support of
his clansmen and blood relations, therefore “silah rehmi (good treatment
of the kindred)” was esteemed most highly among the moral values of the Arabian society
and breaking off of connections with the kindred was regarded as a great sin.
Under, the influence of the same Arabian tradition when the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi
wasallam) began to preach the message of Islam, the other clans of Quraish and
their chiefs resisted and opposed him tooth and nail, but the Bani Hashim and the Bani al-Muttalib (children of
al-Muttalib, brother of Hashim) not only did not oppose him but continued to
support him openly, although most of them had not yet believed in his
Prophethood. The other clans of Quraish themselves regarded this support by the
blood relations of the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) as perfectly in
accordance with the moral traditions of Arabia. That is why they never taunted
the Bani Hashim and the Bani al-Muttalib in that they had abandoned their
ancestral faith by supporting a person who was preaching a new faith. They knew
and believed that they could in no case hand over an individual of their clan
to his enemies, and their support and aid of a clansman was perfectly natural
in the sight of the Quraish and the people of Arabia.
This moral principle,
which the Arabs even in the pre-Islamic days of ignorance, regarded as worthy
of respect and inviolable was broken only by one man in his enmity of Islam, and that was Abu Lahab, son of Abdul Muttalib. He was an uncle of the Prophet, (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) whose father and he were sons of the same father. In Arabia, an uncle
represented the father especially when the nephew was fatherless. The uncle was
expected to look after the nephew as one of his own children. But this man in
his hostility to Islam and love of kufr trampled all the Arab traditions
under foot.
The traditionists have
related from Ibn Abbas (radiyallāhu`anhu)
with several chains of transmitters the tradition that when the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) was commanded to present the message of Islam openly, and he was
instructed in the Quran to warn first of all his nearest kinsfolk of the
punishment of God, he ascended the Mount, Safa one morning and called out aloud: “Ya sabahah (O, the calamity of the
morning!)”. This alarm in Arabia was raised by the person who noticed early at dawn
an enemy tribe advancing against his tribe. When the Messenger (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) made this call, the people inquired as to who had made the call. They
were told that it was Muhammad (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam). There the people of
all the clans of Quraish rushed out. Everyone who could, come. He who could
not, sent another one for himself. When the people had assembled, the Messenger (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) calling out each clan
by name, viz. O Bani Hashim, O Bani Abdul Muttalib, O Bani Fihr, O Bani so and so, said: "If I were to tell you that behind the
hill there was an enemy host ready to fall upon you, would you believe
me?" The people responded with one voice, saying that they never had so
far experienced a lie from him. The Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) said:
"Then I warn you that you are heading for a torment." Thereupon,
before anyone else could speak, Abu Lahab, the Prophet’s uncle, said: "May
you perish! Did you summon us for this?"Another tradition adds that he picked
up a stone to throw at the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam). (Musnad Ahmad,
Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidzi, Ibn Jarir, and others).
According to Ibn Zaid,
one day Abu Lahab asked the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam): "If I were to accept your religion, what
would I get?" The Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) replied: "You
would get what the other believers would get." He said: "Is there no
preference or distinction for me?" The Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi
wasallam) replied: "What else do you want?" Thereupon he said:
"May this religion perishes in which I and all other people should be
equal and alike!" (Ibn Jarir).
In Makkah Abu Lahab
was the next door neighbor of the
Prophet
(Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam). Their houses were separated by a wall. Besides
him, Hakam bin As (Father
of Marwan), Uqbah bin Abi Muait, Adi bin Hamra and Ibn al-Asda il-Hudhali also were his
neighbors. These people did not allow him to have peace even in his own house.
Sometimes when he was performing the Solah, they would place the goat's stomach
on him; sometimes when food was being cooked in the courtyard, they would throw
filth at the cooking pot. The Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) would come out and
say: "O Bani Abdi
Manaf, what kind of neighborliness is it?"Abu Lahab's wife, Umm Jamil (Abu
Sufyan's sister), had made it a practice to cast thorns at his door in the
night so that when he or his children came out of the house at dawn, they
should run thorns in the foot. (Baihaqi, Ibn Abi Hatim, Ibn Jarir, Ibn
Asakir, Ibn Hisham).
Before the
proclamation of Prophethood, two of the Prophet’s daughters were married to two
of Abu Lahab's sons, Utbah and Utaibah. After his call when the
Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) began to invite the people to Islam, Abu Lahab said to both his sons:"I would forbid myself seeing and
meeting you until you divorced the daughters of Muhammad."So, both of them
divorced their wives. Utaibah in particular became
so nasty in his spitefulness that one day he came before the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) and said: "I
repudiate An-najmi idha hawa and Alladhi dana fatadalla" and then he spat at
him, but his spital did not fall on him. The Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) prayed: "O God! Subject him
to the power of a dog from among Your dogs."Afterwards, Utaibah
accompanied his father in his journey to Syria. During the journey the caravan
halted at a place which, according to local people, was visited by wild beasts
at night. Abu Lahab told his companions, the Quraish: “Make full arrangements for the protection of
my son, for I fear the curse invoked by Muhammad (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) on him.” Accordingly, the
people made their camels sit all around Utaibah and went to sleep. At
night a tiger came which crossed the circle of the camels and devoured Utaibah
tearing him to pieces. (Ibn Abdul
Barr: Al-Istiab; Ibn Hajar: Al- Isabah; Abu Nuaim al-Isfahani: Dalail
an-Nubuwwat; As-Suhaili: Raud al-Unuf. Here there is a difference of
opinion. Some reporters say that the divorce took place after the Prophet’s
proclamation of Prophethood and some say that it took place after the
revelation of Tabbat yada Abi Lahab. There is also a
difference of opinion about whether Abu Lahab's this son was Utbah or Utaibah.
But this much is confirmed that after the conquest of Makkah, Utbah embraced
Islam and took the oath of allegiance at the Prophet’s hand. Therefore, the
correct view is that it was Utaibah).
Abu Lahab's wickedness
can be judged from the fact that when after the death of the Prophet’s son, Qasim, his second son, Abdullah, also died, this man instead of joining
with his nephew in his bereavement, hastened to the Quraish chiefs joyfully to
give them the news that Muhammad (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) had become childless
that night. This we have already related in the commentary of Surah Al-Kawthar.
Wherever the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) went to preach his message of Islam, this man followed him and forbade
the people to listen to him. Rabiah
bin Abbad ad- Dill has related: "I was a young
boy when I accompanied my father to the face of Dhul-Majaz. There I saw the
Messenger (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) who was exhorting the
people, saying: 'O people, say: there is no deity but Allah, you will attain
success.' Following behind him I saw a man, who was telling the people, `This
fellow is a liar: he has gone astray from his ancestral faith.' I asked; who is
he? The people replied: He is his uncle, Abu Lahab." (Musnad Ahmad,
Baihaqi).
Another tradition from
Rabiah is to the effect; "I saw that the
Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) went to the halting place of each
tribe and said: `O children of so and so, I have been appointed Allah's
Messenger to you. I exhort you to worship only Allah and to associate none with
Him. So, affirm faith in me and join me so that I may fulfill the mission for
which I have been sent.' Following close behind him there was a man who was
saying: `O children of so and so, he is leading you astray from Lat and Uzza
and inviting you to the religion of error and innovation which he has brought.
Do not at all listen to what he says and do not follow him.' I asked my father:
who is he? He replied: he is his uncle, Abu Lahab." (Musnad Ahmad,
Tabarani).
Tariq bin Abdullah al-Muharibi's tradition is similar.
He says: "I saw in the fare of Dhul-Majaz that the Messenger (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) was exhorting the people, saying: `O people, say La ilaha
ill-Allah, you will attain success', and behind him there was a man who was
casting stones at him, until his heels bled, and he was telling the people: 'Do
not listen to him, he is a liar.' I asked the people who he was. They said he
was his uncle, Abu Lahab." (Tirmidzi).
In the 7th year of Prophethood, when all the clans of
Quraish boycotted the
Bani Hashim and the Bani al-Muttalib socially and economically, and both
these clans remaining steadfast to the Prophet’s support, were besieged in Shib Abi Talib, Abu Lahab was the
only person, who sided with the disbelieving Quraish against his own clan. This
boycott continued for three years, so much so that the Bani Hashim and the Bani
al-Muttalib began to starve. This, however, did not move Abu Lahab. When a
trade caravan came to Makkah and a besieged person from Shib Abi Talib
approached it to buy some article of food, Abu Lahab would shout out to the
merchants to demand a forbidding price, telling them that he would make up for
any loss that they incurred. Thus, they would demand exorbitant rates and the
poor customer had to return empty handed to his starving children. Then Abu
Lahab would purchase the same articles from them at the market rates. (Ibn
Sa'd, Ibn Hisham).
On account of these
very misdeeds this man was condemned in this Surah by name, and there was a
special need for it. When the Prophet’s own uncle followed and opposed him
before the Arabs who came for hajj from outside Makkah, or gathered together in
the fares held at different places, they regarded it as against the established
traditions of Arabia that an uncle should run down his nephew without a reason,
should pelt stones at him and bring false accusations against him publicly. They
were, therefore, influenced by what Abu Lahab said and were involved in doubt
about the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam). But when this, Surah was revealed, and Abu Lahab, filled with rage,
started uttering nonsense, the people realized that what he said in opposition
to the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) was not at all reliable, for he said all that in his mad hostility to
his nephew.
Besides, when his
uncle was condemned by name, the people's expectation that the Messenger (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) could treat some relative leniently in the matter of religion was
frustrated forever. When the Messenger’s own uncle was taken to task publicly
the people understood that there was no room for preference or partiality in their
faith. A non-relative could become a near and dear one if he believed and a
near relation a non-relative if he disbelieved. Thus, there is no place for the
ties of blood in religion.
Bismillāhir Rahmānir Raheem
In the name of Allah,
the Compassionate, the Merciful.
Tabbat yada abee
lahabiñ watab
111:1
Ma aghna `anhu
maluhuwama kasab
Sayasla naran
thatalahab
Wamraatuhu
hammalatalhatab
Fee jeediha hablun min
masad
Around her neck is a
rope of [twisted] fiber.
[1-5] Broken were the hands of Abu Lahab
and he was doomed to utter failure.[1] His wealth and
whatever he earned did not avail him anything[.2] Certainly he shall be cast into a
blazing Fire. And his wife, too,[3] the bearer of
slander.[4] Round her neck
will be a rope of palm-fibre.[5]
1. His real name was 'Abd al-'Uzza, and he was called Abu Lahab on account of his glowing, ruddy
complexion. Lahab means the flame of
fire, and Abu Lahab the one with a flaming, fiery face. His being mentioned
here by his nickname (Kunyat),
instead of his real name, has several reasons. First, that he was better known
by his nickname than by his real name; second, that the Qur'an did not approve
that he should be mentioned by his polytheistic name `Abd al 'Uzza (slave of 'Uzza); third, that his kunyat goes well with the fate that has been
described of him in this Surah.
Some commentators have translated “tabbat yada Abi Lahab” to mean: "May the
hands of Abu Lahab be broken", and tabby to mean: “may he perish" or "he
perished". But this, in fact, was not a curse which was
invoked on him, but a prophecy in which an event taking place in the future,
has been described in the past tense, to suggest that its occurrence in the
future is certain and inevitable.
In actual fact, at last the same
thing happened as had been foretold in this Surah a few years earlier. Breaking
of the hands obviously does not imply breaking of the physical hands, but a
person's utterly failing in his aim and object for which he has exerted his
utmost. And Abu Lahab indeed had exerted his utmost to defeat and frustrate the
message of Islam presented by the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam). But
hardly seven or eight years after the revelation of this Surah most of the big
chiefs of Quraish, who were a party with Abu Lahab in his hostility to Islam,
were killed in the Battle of Badr. When the news of the defeat reached Makkah,
he was so shocked that he could not survive for more than seven days. His death
occurred in a pitiable state. He became afflicted with malignant pustule and
the people of his house left him to himself, fearing contagion. No one came
near his body for three days after his death, until the body decomposed and
began to stink. At last, when the people began to taunt his sons, according to
one tradition, they hired some Africans, who lifted his body and buried it.
According to another tradition,
they got a pit dug out and threw his body into it by pushing it with wood, and
covered it up with earth and stones. His utter failure became manifest when the
religion which he had tried his utmost to impede and thwart, was accepted by
his own children. First of all, his daughter, Darrah, migrated from Makkah to
Madinah and embraced Islam; then on the conquest of Makkah, both his sons, `Utbah and Mu`attab, came before the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) through
the mediation of `Abbas
(radiyallahu`anhu), believed and took oath of allegiance to him.
2. Abu Lahab was a stingy,
materialistic man. Ibn Jarir has stated that once in the pre-Islamic days he
was accused of having stolen two golden deer from the treasury of the Ka'bah.
Though later the deer were recovered from another person, the fact that he was
accused of stealing indicates the opinion the people of Makkah held of him.
About his riches Qadi Rashid bin Zubair writes in his “Adh-Dhakha'ir wat-Tuhaf”. He was one of the
four richest men of the Quraish, who owned one qintar (about 260 oz) of gold
each. His love of wealth can be judged from the fact that when on the occasion
of the battle of Badr the fate of his religion was going to be decided forever,
and all the Quraish chiefs had personally gone to fight, he sent `As bin Hisham
to fight on his own behalf, telling him: This is in lieu of the debt of four
thousand dirhams that you owe to me. Thus, he contrived a plan to realize his
debt, for 'As had become bankrupt and there was no hope of the recovery of the
debt from him.
Some commentators have taken “ma kasaba” in the meaning of the earning, i.e.
the benefits that accrued to him from his wealth were his “kasab (earning)”, and some other commentators
have taken it to imply children, for the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam)
has said that a man's son also is his “kasab
(earning)”. (Abu Dawud, Ibn Abi Hatim). Both these meanings fully
correspond to the fate met by Abu Lahab. For when he was afflicted with the
malignant pustule, his wealth availed him nothing, and his children also left
him alone to die a miserable, wretched death. They did not even bury him
honorably. Thus, within a few years the people witnessed how the prophecy which
had been made in this Surah about Abu Lahab was literally fulfilled.
3. Her name was Arwa' and her nickname
(kunyat) Umm Jamil. She was sister of Abu Sufyan and was no less
bitter than her husband, Abu Lahab, in her enmity to the Messenger (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam). Abu Bakr's daughter, Asma’ (radiyallahu`anha), has related that when this Surah was revealed, and Umm Jamil heard it,
she was filled with rage and went out in search of the Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam). She carried a handful of stones and she was lamenting some
verses of her own, satirizing the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam). She
came to the Ka`bah, where the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) was sitting
with Abu Bakar As-Siddiq (radiyallahu`anhu). The latter said: "O Messenger of Allah, there she comes and I fear
lest she should utter something derogatory to you." The Prophet
(Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam) replied: "She
will not see me." The same thing happened. She could not see the
Prophet (Sallallāhu
alayhi wasallam) although
he was there. She said to Abu Bakar: "I
hear that your Companion has satirized me." Abu Bakar (radiyallahu`anhu) replied: "No, by the Lord of this
house, he has not satirized you." Hearing this she went off. (Ibn
Abi Hatim, Ibn Hisham; Bazzar has related an incident on the authority of
'Abdullah bin `Abbas (radiyallahu`anhu) also, which closely resembles
this). What Abu Bakar As-Siddiq (radiyallahu`anhu)
meant was that she had not been
satirized by the Prophet (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam), but by Allah Himself.
4. The words in the original are “hammalat al-hatab”, which literally mean: "carrier of the wood". The
commentators have given several meanings of it. `Abdullah bin `Abbas, Ibn Zaid,
Dahhak and Rabi` bin Anas say: She used to strew
thorns at the Prophet’s door in the night; therefore, she has been described as
carrier of the wood. Qatadah, Ikrimah Hasan Bari, Mujahid and Sufyan
Thawri say: She used to carry evil tales and
slander from one person to another in order to create hatred between them;
therefore, she has been called the bearer of wood idiomatically. Sa`id
bin Jubair says: The one who is loading himself with the burden of sin, is
described idiomatically in Arabic as: “Fulan-un
Yahtatibu ala zahri bi (so and so is
loading wood on his back)”; therefore, “hummalat
al-hatab” means: “The one who carries
the burden of sin.” Another meaning also which the commentators have
given is: she will do this in the Hereafter, i.e. she will bring and supply
wood to the fire in which Abu Lahab would be burning.
5. The word used for her neck is jid, which in Arabic means a neck decorated
with an ornament. Sa`id bin al-Musayyab, Hasan Basri and Qatadah say that she
wore a valuable necklace and used to say: "By
Lat and `Uzza, I will sell away this necklace and expend the price to satisfy
my enmity against Muhammad (Sallallāhu alayhi wasallam)." That is
why the word jid has been used here
ironically, thereby implying that in Hell she would have a rope of palm-fibre
round her neck instead of that necklace upon which she prides herself so
arrogantly. Another example of this ironical style is found at several places in
the Qur'an in the sentence: Bashshir-hum
bi-`adhab-in alima "Give them the good news of a painful torment."
The words “habl-um min-masad” have been used for the rope
which will be put round her neck, i e. it will be a rope of the masad kind. Different meanings of this have
been given by the lexicographers and commentators. According to some, masad means a tightly twisted rope; others say
that: masad is the rope made from
palm-fibre; still others say that it means the rope made from rush, or
camel-skin, or camel-hair. Still another view is that it implies a cable made
by twisted iron strands together.
And Allāh Almighty Knows best.
[Excerpted from “Tafhim al-Qur'an (The Meaning of the Qur'an)”
by Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi via SearchTruth.com]
2 comments:
AsSalam Bro Radzi:
Is there any write-up on 'istiqamah?'
Thanks. Wassalam.
http://al-hussaini.blogspot.com/search/label/The%20Concept%20of%20Istiqamah
Post a Comment